| | < | |
| > | |
|
| << | |
| Up | |
| >> |</td>
| |
|
|
|
|Top| |
|Contents| |
|Index| |
| ? | |
</tr></table>
How your build system interacts with CVS
As mentioned in the introduction,
CVS
does not contain software for building your software from source code. This section describes how various aspects of your build system might interact with
CVS
.
One common question, especially from people who are accustomed to
RCS
, is how to make their build get an up to date copy of the sources. The answer to this with
CVS
is two-fold. First of all, since
CVS
itself can recurse through directories, there is no need to modify your
`Makefile'
(or whatever configuration file your build tool uses) to make sure each file is up to date. Instead, just use two commands, first
cvs -q update
and then
make
or whatever the command is to invoke your build tool. Secondly, you do not necessarily
want
to get a copy of a change someone else made until you have finished your own work. One suggested approach is to first update your sources, then implement, build and test the change you were thinking of, and then commit your sources (updating first if necessary). By periodically (in between changes, using the approach just described) updating your entire tree, you ensure that your sources are sufficiently up to date.
One common need is to record which versions of which source files went into a particular build. This kind of functionality is sometimes called
bill of materials
or something similar. The best way to do this with
CVS
is to use the
tag
command to record which versions went into a given build (see section [[CVS--Concurrent Versions System v1.12.12.1: Revisions#SEC50|Tags-Symbolic revisions]]).
Using
CVS
in the most straightforward manner possible, each developer will have a copy of the entire source tree which is used in a particular build. If the source tree is small, or if developers are geographically dispersed, this is the preferred solution. In fact one approach for larger projects is to break a project down into smaller separately-compiled subsystems, and arrange a way of releasing them internally so that each developer need check out only those subsystems which they are actively working on.
Another approach is to set up a structure which allows developers to have their own copies of some files, and for other files to access source files from a central location. Many people have come up with some such a system using features such as the symbolic link feature found in many operating systems, or the
VPATH
feature found in many versions of
make
. One build tool which is designed to help with this kind of thing is Odin (see
ftp://ftp.cs.colorado.edu/pub/distribs/odin
).
This document was generated by Derek Price on July, 20 2005 using texi2html 1.77.
Ximbiot LLC
695 E Square Lake Rd
Troy, MI 48085-3169
(248) 918-2396